Вменяемость как юридическая презумпция и как условие уголовной ответственности лица, совершившего преступление

Abstract

На основе анализа современных достижений науки (уголовного права, психиатрии и др.), судебно-психиатрических и психологических экспертиз, правоприменительной практики излагаются новые подходы к сущности понятий вменяемости, невменяемости и уменьшенной вменяемости = Based on the analysis of modern achievements of science (criminal law, psychiatry, etc.), forensic psychiatric and psychological examinations, lawenforcement practice, new approaches to the essence of the concepts of sanity, insanity and diminished sanity are presented. The different points of view of leading legal scholars of the two countries on the problematic issues of the conditions of criminal liability in terms of the sanity of the subject of a crime are considered. Comparative analysis of the criminal legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation in the studied area is carried out. Particular attention is paid to the absence of any legislative definition of sanity in the criminal codes of our states. Recommendations aimed at increasing the efficiency of judicial investigative practice and improving the criminal law are offered.